ABSTRACT
Study objective: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) are increasingly implemented in complex care based on the principle that they lead to evidence-based treatment recommendations, foster adherence to clinical guidelines, induce better team performance and improve medical care. In oncofertility, the uncertain outcomes of fertility preservation procedures in children contribute to the complexity of decision-making. There is limited published information on the influence of MDMs on paediatric and adolescent oncofertility care. Aim(s): To describe the implementation, characteristics & outcomes of multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) in a paediatric oncofertility setting. Method(s): A retrospective medical records review of oncofertility MDMs held between April 2020 and March 2021 at the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne. Inductive content analysis of the reasons for MDM was undertaken. MDM documentation was scored out of 24, according to a Victorian Paediatric Integrated Cancer Service quality assurance checklist for MDMs, (1)) which included consent for MDM, nature of attendees, quality of discussion and documentation. Result(s): Of the 169 oncology patients treated at the Royal Children's Hospital between 1st April 2020 and 31st March 2021, MDMs were required for 40 patients (23.7%). The median number of clinical attendees was 10, and included craft groups from both paediatric and adult centres (oncology, oncofertility, gynaecology, clinical ethics, endocrinology, paediatric surgery, anaesthetics, haematology, fertility specialists and reproductive scientists). Fifty-four percent (n=22) of MDMs were for male patients (median age 8.4 [0.1-16.5] years) and 46% for females (n=18, median age 8.1[0.4-16.3] years). The commonest diagnoses presented at MDM were brain tumours (27.5%), leukemia (25%), and non malignant conditions (19.5%). Approximately 77% of all MDM patients were going to receive treatment that put them at high infertility risk and 62.5% had co-morbidities. MDMs included the following themes (i) likelihood of successful parenthood: disease progression, prognosis, neurocognitive decline;(ii) certainty or otherwise of planned treatment and infertility risks;(iii) mitigation of anaesthetic and surgical risks;(iv) ethical concerns;(v) organizational capacity and logistics in the face of covid restrictions or high dependent care between centres (vi) child and family of risks, expectations and their values regarding fertility preservation. In 87.5% of cases, it was deemed permissible to offer fertility preservation. The median score for the MDMs derived from the quality assurance checklist was 16. Conclussion: MDMs acted as a valuable educational and communication tool improving situational awareness, building shared mental models, assisting with risk mitigation and oncofertility planning.Copyright © 2023